Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

Friday, 9 September 2022

Theories: Marxist, Ecocritical, Feminist and Queer Criticism

Hello! This blog is assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad sir. It deals with various literary theories like Feminism, queer study, eco-criticism, and Marxism. This blog deals with Feminism, other blogs which deal with other theories are hyperlinked in the end.
 
Feminist criticism

What is feminism? It is an advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of the equality of the sexes. Equality on political, social, personal and economic grounds. The fight for feminism is not for having more value than men/ male gender in society but for having equal value in society. Feminism emerged as a socio-political movement before a literary movement.


Feminism is seen in waves. The first 19th and early 20th centuries comprised women's suffrage movements of the 19th and early 20th centuries, promoting women's right to vote. The second wave Mid-20th century, the women’s liberation movement, began in the 1960s and campaigned for legal and social equality for women. In or around 1992, a third wave Late 20th and early 21st centuries was identified, characterized by a focus on individuality and diversity. Additionally, some have argued for the existence of a fourth wave, starting around 2012, which has used social media to combat sexual harassments, violence against women and rape culture, and it is best known for the me too movement.

Feminism as a socio-political movement inspired literature to look for the women in itself. The books that played an important role in bringing and looking for feminism in literature are-

Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792),
John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women (1869), and
The American Margaret Fuller’s Woman in the Nineteenth Century (1845).

The very important precursor of feminism in literature is Virginia Woolf, who, in addition to her fiction, wrote A Room of One’s Own (1929) and numerous other essays on women authors and on the cultural, economic, and educational disabilities within what she called a “patriarchal” society, dominated by men, that have hindered or prevented women from realizing their productive and creative possibilities. Other important writers in this field are Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949), Mary Elman's Thinking about Women (1968), and Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics.

There is a long detailed Wikipedia page on this theory. CLICK HERE


The question also arises about the fundamental concerns in feminism. (M.H. Abrams)
The basic view is that Western civilization is pervasively patriarchal

It is widely held that while one’s sex as a man or woman is determined by anatomy, the prevailing concepts of gender

The further claim is that this patriarchal (or “masculinist,” or “androcentric”) ideology pervades those writings that have been traditionally considered great literature gynocritics—that is, a criticism that concerns itself with developing a specifically female framework for dealing with works written by women, in all aspects of their production, motivation, analysis, and interpretation, and in all literary forms, including journals and letters.

One concern of gynocritics is to identify distinctively feminine subject matters in literature written by women—the world of domesticity, for example, or the special experiences of gestation, giving birth, and nurturing, or mother-daughter and woman-woman relations—in which personal and affectional issues, and not external activism, are the primary interest.

Another concern is to uncover in literary history a female tradition, incorporated in subcommunities of women writers who were aware of, emulated, and found support in earlier women writers, and who in turn provide models and emotional support to their own readers and successors.

A third undertaking is to show that there is a distinctive feminine mode of experience, or “subjectivity,” in thinking, feeling, valuing, and perceiving oneself and the outer world. Related to this is the attempt (thus far, without much agreement about details) to specify the traits of a “woman’s language,” or distinctively feminine style of speech and writing, in sentence structure, types of relations between the elements of discourse, and characteristic figures of speech and imagery.

Often we realize or get questioned that this is only a patriarchal society that is trying to pull the leg of the female society. And we see no, women are majorly not even supported by women. For a glance if we just take an example of our TV shows/ Television series where women are always planning and plotting against other women. We rarely find women supporting women. Television plays an important role in shaping society.

Patriarchy is not only male society dominating women or females but it has turned to be an ideology. We see the old-age women are the agency of patriarchy. In the family grandmother or in movies the old character will always give morals on how women should and take care of the family. Women are created to take care of male society. Adichie Ngozi in her speech on feminism said- we/ society always try to create a boy hard/ tough man which gives them a fragile ego and we train girls to cater to that ego and shrink them.

Religion has always tried to tie women. Religion gave an idea of women doing fast for their family and children. It gives stories where women are doing only household work. बेटी तो पराया धन होती है। is a strong concern from religion. It plays an important role in shaping women as Indian ideal wife material. Still today we see that women are more in to follow the religious path, in spite it forcing them to shrink. One of the examples is Zaira Wasim. She played a role in the Bollywood movie Dangal in a young age but suddenly later she dropped Bollywood and went close to her religion, the Islamic religion. For walking on the path of religion she dropped her whole career despite being a talented actress. Here is her FB post. A recent example of how women can't grow. The whole society in one or another way traps and stops, it becomes necessary to come out of all this construction.


When we read literature, we connect ourselves in it. We find ourselves in that that suggests closely the relation of novels in our everyday ;life. Today the world is digitizing. Cinema is taking the place of literature and stories. Cinema plays an important role as a mirror of society and it also shapes society. As we discussed above women, and aged women like grandmothers/ aged women are the agencies of patriarchy. Women try to tie their daughters or daughters-in-law in the frame of ideal women.

The bollywood movie Thappad directed by Anubhav Sinha is a movie in which a woman fights back and stands for herself only for one slap and asks for a divorce. In this mainstream story, we also see minor stories of a maid and a lawyer. Protagonist Amruta has a point about how her husband cannot slap her in any situation. During the emotional and mental breakdown of Amruta, we find her mother and mother-in-law saying

बस यही सुनना बाकी रह गया था कि बेटी डीवोर्स करेगी|
जाने दे बेटा, थोड़ा बर्दाश्त करना सीखना चाहिए औरतों को.”
This is an example of how women shape women in order to cater male ego, how women are the agency of patriarchy.


Women are always permitted. They don’t have to do anything without permission. We find many people who think they are superior for letting women grow, work and earn. They boast that they are open minded to let their daughter- in- law work and earn. Such characters are represented in various Bollywood movies also. Here is Rahul Bose and Manav in Dil Dhadakne do (2015) directed by Zoya Akhtar.


Pink is a 2016 Bollywood movie directed by Aniruddhsinh Chowdhary. A patriarchal male-dominated mindset is represented in a movie by the character of Rajveer Singh. How the minds of men are conditioned. They feel their rights of women and how women are expected to shrink themselves to safeguard their dignity and chastity is aptly shown in these women.


In the contemporary period, we feel we are growing. Women are getting their places, they are having their domination. But if one woman is earning and free or independent doesn't mean everyone is. Till every woman or majority of don't get their place, independence we can never say that women are not under control anymore. One TVC telecom tried to show a woman out of her traditional conventional work, in a way to show progress

But here in this TVC, we see that the ad fails to show women's progress. Even after she is the boss in the office. She has to cook food for her husband after office work and invites her husband for food. Despite being a boss. This in a way reflects the mindset of the society which boasts about letting their wife and daughter- in law work. Society is trying to show off its ‘independent mindset’.


Moving towards feminist criticism is locating women in the literature. The issues they face in society and how they lose their identity. Today we are living in the 21st century but still, the most loved Bollywood movies are movies in which heroines feel themselves complete after the hero enters their life.


These are a few examples of movies where female protagonists are independent and bold but they feel complete in their life when they find a man in their life.

Here is also a meme of Anjali of Kuch Kuch hota hai. She was an independent blog sports girl but wasn't loved by Rahul. In the second part of the movie, she is an ideal wife material. Girl with long hair and so-called beauty and Rahul falls in love with her. This is a real cringe. Bollywood gives a frame of what type of girls are loved and to boys, whom to love.


Recently the #wokyaboli is also trending by BBC News. One must check out it on the Instagram page of BBC news and on Twitter also.


We must not forget that feminism is for equal rights. Women are physically and biologically not as strong and hard as men adding to it they have soft and emotional conditioning of mind. And to have equality firstly equity is necessary in society. Slowly and steadily ideologies will change and the world will change. This change cannot be brought in a day or year.

Looking over contemporary times we realize even today society is not ready to accept girl’s freedom. They are not ready to give part of their property to their daughters if they don't follow them. દીકરી ને ગાય દોરે ત્યાં જાય. Girls are expected to follow and not to question.



I hope this blog is useful. Thanks for visiting.

Friday, 3 June 2022

Relevance of ‘The Plague’ in contemporary Covid-19 crisis- Paper Presentation

 Relevance of ‘The Plague’ in Contemporary Covid-19 crisis


English Dept. of MK Bhavnagar university organised two days webinar in this lock-down period.The topic of webinar was 'Literature and epidemic'. This webinar gave a great chance to hear the views of expert speakers and to grow our thoughts and ideas on this particular topic. Some topics were so unique that we would have never thought about it. I presented a paper for the first time, My topic for this presentation was 'Relevance of 'The Plague' in contemporary covid-19 crisis'. I took reference from the novel 'The Plague' written by Albert Camus which was about the plague condition in Oran in 1940. It is awful that literature has already suggested epidemics and steps to prevent it but yet human beings fail to learn historical lesson from the historicity of the literature. This Seminar was broadcasted live of Prof. Dr. Dilip Barad's Facebook page and you tube Channel. 




This is my Presentation I presented in the seminar


This is video recording of my presentation.




Thank you for visiting I hope my this presentation and video recording are useful to you.


Sunday, 13 March 2022

Theory of Archetypes

Here I am with an interesting topic, Archetypes. This blog is a response to the assigned task By Dr. Dilip Barad sir. In simple words, Archetypal literary criticism is a theory that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths and archetypes in the narrative and symbols, images and character types in a literary work. Let us try to understand in depth. In this blog I Am going to answer the questions which will help you for better understanding.

ARCHETYPAL CRITICISM

I have taken the reference of the essay The Archetypes of Literature by Northrop Frye.

Northrop Frye:


Herman Northrop Frye (July 14, 1912 – January 23, 1991) was a Canadian literary critic and literary theorist, considered one of the most influential of the 20th century. Frye was named a national historic person in 2018. Read more about him.

Archetypal criticism peaked in popularity in the 1940s and 1950s, largely due to the work of Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye (1912-1991). Archetypal literary criticism is a type of analytical theory that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths, and archetypes (from the Greek archē, "beginning", and typos, "imprint") in the narrative, symbols, image and character types in literary works.

What is Archetypal Criticism?
In the beginning let us take archetype as a pattern. Reality is complex and to understand reality stories, myths were used. From This story archetypes emerged. Archetypes are perhaps earliest/ ancient patterns. Archetypes are shared across various cultures in different timelines, even to cultures not connected or known.

Carl Jung took analysis in a different direction instead of looking into individual people to understand human behavior. He looked at human imagination and shared experience to explain behavior. Freud gave the unconscious as a storehouse for repressed desire and emotions, Jung believed that it had a second layer. This one is a deeper, more universal shared memory, common to the whole human race. He called this the collective unconscious. Jung uses the Greek work archetype to explain this content. Our psychic archetypes are recurring patterns of images, symbols, themes and stories that help us to make our lives. According to Jung, wisdom, creativity, and good health are present only when we are in harmony with the archetypes and universal symbols in the collective unconscious. We are able to reveal essential archetypes and symbols in dreams and myths. While dreams are personal manifestations of the individual unconscious, myths are societal manifestations of the collective unconscious. Since ancient times people have turned to stories to help them understand and cope with life. Myths are similar over cultures and eras. Myths are dramatic representations of deep instinctual life of humankind.

Northrop Frye proposed the idea that the main appeal of literature was its connection to primitive story formulas. He claimed literature is a kind of displaced mythology that constantly reverts to the same patterns that we see in Ancient myths.

In literature we can often identify archetypal geography like garden of Eden or wasteland, character types, heroes and villains and themes like good vs evil.

What does the archetypal critic do?
An archetypal critic tries to analyze a pattern in symbols, myth, ritual or stories in literary works to identify the specific pattern.


What is Frye trying to prove by giving an analogy of ' Physics to Nature' and 'Criticism to Literature'?
Frye starts his essay with ideas about progressive study of every organized body of knowledge. Using an analogy of Physics to nature he says that Physics, a branch of science, is an organized body of knowledge about nature, a student says he is learning physics not nature.


Similarly, art (literature) like nature is subject of systematic study, where physics is like Criticism.

Many times language students are supposed to write creative works and have fluent speaking of language but this is not what is taught in language or literature class. It is impossible to ‘learn literature’ . What one learns is ‘criticism of literature’. So, literature is an organized body of knowledge and criticism is a systematic studying part of this body.


Criticism as we find it in learned journals and scholarly monographs has every characteristic of a science. Evidence is examined scientifically; previous authorities are used scientifically; fields are investigated scientifically; texts are edited scientifically. Prosody is scientific in structure; so is phonetics; so is philology.



Thus, Physics as literature and nature as Criticism. As the physics students study, read, learn Nature and call it Physics. Similarly, literature students do not ‘learn literature’ they learn to criticize, ‘learn to read’ literature.

Share your views of Criticism as an organized body of knowledge. Mention relation of literature with history and philosophy.

Literature is the central division of Humanities and Criticism turns out to be a subdivision of Literature. So for the systematic understanding of the subject student have to study the conceptual framework of the historian for events and philosophers of the ideas.


Comparing with the study of the science (organized body of knowledge), eg. If a human body is to be understood a student or doctor will look at the body based on their field. A neurologist will study the brain, a cardiologist will study the heart, Pulmonologist will study the respiratory system, etc. Similarly when one reads studies specific literary work a feminist critic will criticize feminist view, a queer theorist will criticize through queer theory, an existentialist will criticize existential point of view, etc. Which shows Criticism/ Literature is also an organized body of knowledge.

On the basic idea literature is majorly stories and we read these stories with various perspectives. How are these stories created? The two pillars for this in history and philosophy. Historical events provide the plot of the story and philosophy provides ideas and wisdom we read in characters. So before reading any literary work framework reading of history and philosophy becomes necessary to understand the setting, meaning, and contemporary time of the work.

Briefly explain the inductive method with illustration of Shakespeare's Hamlet's Grave Digger's scene.

Frye has used inductive and deductive methodology in Archetypal criticism.


In simple language, an inductive method can be defined as ‘particular to general’. It is used to describe reasoning that involves using specific observations, such as observed patterns, to make a general conclusion.

Let us try to understand, by an indicative method, the Archetype ‘LIEBESTOD’ through the Grave Digger scene from Shakespeare’s play Hamlet. Liebestod is a German word which means love- death. The scene begins with the puns; from puns to soliloquy, images of corruption and decay, psychological relation between digger and price; declaration of Hamlet's love for Ophelia and Hamlet and brother (Laertes)- sister. All this collectively comes to particular archetype liebestod.


Laertes was angry at Hamlet and if He came out he would definitely be murdered but still he comes out in love for Ophelia which his readiness to die for love and which is Leibestod.

Briefly explain deductive methods with reference to an analogy to Music, Painting, rhythm and pattern. Give examples of the outcome of deductive methods.

Frye has used inductive and deductive methodology in Archetypal criticism.


In simple words, the deductive method is ‘from general to particular’. It is a method of reasoning by which concrete applications or consequences are deduced from general principles or theorems are deduced from definitions and postulates.

Art like music moves with time; we require time to understand, listen and feel to music. And art like painting is like space; hundreds of years on earth is like seconds in space. Looking and enjoying painting requires no time, it can be enjoyed in a blink. Music (time) and painting (space) both recur in rhythm (when it is temporal) and pattern (when it is spatial) respectively. In this we come to the general deduction that literature is intermediate between music and painting. Its words form rhythms which approach a musical sequence of sounds at one of its boundaries, and from patterns which approach the hieroglyphic or pictorial image at the other.

Refer to the Indian seasonal grid . If you can, please read a small Gujarati or Hindi or English poem from the archetypal approach and apply Indian seasonal grid in the interpretation.






In this poem a poet is calling her beloved to come as ‘vasant’ season which is beginning of summer a season of romance according to mythos grid.


These lines indicate the winter season, ‘gile khato’ indicates sadness of the writer. So here winter season can be read as irony.

I Hope this blog was helpful to you. Thanks for visiting.

Innovative Teaching Practices (Academic year 2025-26)

  Beyond Chalk and Talk: A Year of Creative Classrooms II This blog is a reflection of my teaching Digital Professionalism and Interpersonal...